Scandoil  

Lofoten: putting facts in place


Published Feb 16, 2011
[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Edit page New page Hide edit links

Lofoten

The technical basis for managing activities in parts of the northern NCS was revised in 2010, with the PSA providing input on safety and the working environment in the petroleum sector.

An updated version of the integrated management plan for the Barents Sea and the Norwegian Sea off Lofoten (BHL) is due to be submitted in a White Paper before the end of March.

Many government agencies and scientific teams have contributed updated mapping, research and monitoring data about the environment, resources, value creation, oil spill risks and the human impact on the ecosystem in these waters.

The PSA has served on the risk group and the technical forum, two of three teams – the third being the monitoring group – set up to strengthen the knowledge base for the plan.

These delivered a collective report last April to the Ministry of the Environment, which is coordinating the work. The PSA has also posted supporting technical papers to its own website.

Among the agency’s technical contributions were descriptions of possible blowout scenarios, based on available knowledge and experience.

This information related to the petroleum sector, the NCS in general, the BHL area in particular, accidents and the management of such mishaps.

The blowout scenario for the BHL region was selected from a combination of flow rates, durations and oil properties which is unfavourable from an overall perspective.

Following the Deepwater Horizon disaster last April, the risk group was asked to evaluate the technical conclusions drawn for the BHL plan in the light of this Gulf of Mexico incident.

Extensive assessments made in the PSA’s jurisdiction included risk conditions related to acute discharges, and likely discharge scenarios in terms of rates, duration, volumes and so forth.

Given what is known so far about the Gulf of Mexico incident, the PSA found no technical arguments to justify significant changes to the factual basis for the BHL management plan.

Tags: Petroleum Safety Authority




Advertisment:

Add a Comment to this Article

Please be civil. Job and promotion will not be added into the comment page.

(Use Markdown for formatting.)

This question helps prevent spam:

+ Larger Font | + Smaller Font
Top Stories

 

 

 

 


 


RSS

RSS
Newsletter
Newsletter
Mobile News
Mobile news

Computer
Our news on
your website


Facebook
Facebook
Twitter
Twitter

Contact
Contact
Tips
Do you have any
tips to us

 

sitemap xml